EOSC Stakeholder Forum Position Papers Submission

The EOSC stakeholder Forum, aims at charting a course towards a concrete and sustainable EOSC, identifying first steps on the EU added-value of EOSC and its building blocks to make European Open Science a user-friendly reality.

The EOSC Stakeholder Forum focus themes include:

Open Science benefits: demonstrating federation and how to overcome fragmentation
Findings and Call for action by stakeholder group on: User needs, Key services and their provision, and Governance
Building blocks for a stakeholder driven EOSC: Skills & Data Stewardship, Cross disciplinary Research, Interoperability & FAIR principles
EOSC service architecture & portfolio
EOSC sustainability
EOSC Governance

We are collecting position papers on the focus themes as described in the event sessions from all participants and stakeholders. This will give you excellent visibility both at the event and through the EOSCpilot web portal where your paper will also be published.

Each position paper will include a series of questions based on specific topics developed within each sessions at the event.

Consult the event agenda to check the session you are most interest in, then select the day and the session for which you would like to submit your position paper and fill in the questions in the form below.

All position papers will be submitted to an editorial review before publication.

Please note that the deadline for submission is 24 November.

Name *

Surname *

Organisation *

Select the day *

28 November

29 November

Select your session *

Title of the position paper *

Attachment

Please use this field if you would like to upload a doc/PDF version of your Position Paper. Please note that the word limit is 700 words.
Files must be less than 2 MB.
Allowed file types: gif jpg jpeg png txt rtf pdf doc docx odt.

1. What are the services that your research collaboration would benefit from as consumer of EOSC? *

2. Do you envisage the need of shared services that EOSC could provide with central coordination, to take advance of economies of scale and ensure harmonization across different providers? *

3. What criteria should the EOSC services meet in order to be appealing to your research collaboration? *

4. What services and resources (e.g. data, publications, software and other digital artefacts) could you provide for sharing, third party access and use through the EOSC? *

5. How do you see your role in fostering the uptake of the FAIR principles in your environment? *

1. How can EOSC support research training providers to contribute to international level training infrastructure? *

2. How can EOSC assist research performing organisations to develop the competences and capabilities for open data science? *

3. How can EOSC coordinate national-level policies, strategies and reward mechanisms to stimulate open research data practices? *

1. What are the key requirements and main use cases for EOSC services to serve long tail research data users? *

2. Referring to the Thematic Areas point of the EOSC declaration, in your opinion, what should the structure and components of the EOSC “common reference scheme” be? *

3. Questions to research communities: What will the impact of Open Science be in your specific field? What would you develop first in the one-stop-shop for your discipline and Open Science? *

1. How can we invite, motivate, and support those areas in which the FAIR principle is not fully implemented yet? *

2. What are the major challenges for research infrastructures to be part of an EOSC architecture? *

3. How does the connection of e-infrastructures in the EOSC context correlate with similar efforts on the national level? *

3. How can we facilitate the participation of additional and more diverse stakeholders, particularly the industry, the public sector and citizens, in the European Open Science Cloud? *

1. What are the services that EOSC should provide to enable the transition to Open Science? *

2. What services should be delivered to facilitate resource providers in their participation to EOSC? *

3. What are the services and processes that EOSC should deliver to ensure federated provisioning across multiple suppliers? *

1. The service portfolio needs to be driven by user’s needs. How can the EOSC governance be structured in order to ensure adequate representation of users and active participation in the service portfolio management in EOSC? *

2. What criteria should services of the EOSC meet in order to be part of the service portfolio? *

3. How can certification be organized to ensure that services of the EOSC service portfolio meet a list of community-defined requirements? *

1. Which minimal set of information would you need to select/consume an EOSC service? *

2.Which specific criteria would be key for you & your community? *

3.From your point of view, do the draft Principles of Engagement identified so far enable open science? *

1.The European Open Science Cloud will create an environment for researchers to be most effective in publishing, dissemination, long-term preservation and reuse of research data. Making research data optimally suitable for FAIR is a key element of the EOSC. How do you see your role as users/enablers in fostering the uptake of the FAIR principles in your environment? *

2.Can you think about effective alternatives to the current evaluation and reward systems and how would you see your role as users/enablers in advocating for the establishment of alternative incentives? *

3.How do you see the role of your organisation/institution in promoting and supporting the EOSC? *

3.How can we facilitate the participation of additional and more diverse stakeholders, particularly the industry, the public sector and citizens, in the European Open Science Cloud? *

1.What are the services that EOSC should provide to enable the transition to Open Science? *

2.What services should be delivered to facilitate resource providers in their participation to EOSC? *

3.What are the services and processes that EOSC should deliver to ensure federated provisioning across multiple suppliers? *

1.The service portfolio needs to be driven by user’s needs. How can the EOSC governance be structured in order to ensure adequate representation of users and active participation in the service portfolio management in EOSC? *

2.What criteria should services of the EOSC meet in order to be part of the service portfolio? *

3.How can certification be organized to ensure that services of the EOSC service portfolio meet a list of community-defined requirements? *

1. What is your view on EOSC and its mission? What should the role of your organization and of similar ones be in EOSC? *

2. What do you believe must be the key responsibilities of an EOSC Advisory Stakeholder body in order for it to play an effective role in governance of the EOSC? *

3.How should the membership of an EOSC Advisory Stakeholder body be constituted and how should members be selected? What are the necessary factors for ensuring the effectiveness of an EOSC Advisory Stakeholder body? *

Leave this field blank

EOSC Stakeholder Forum Position Papers Submission

You are here

Primary tabs

Search form

EOSC Stakeholder Forum Position Papers Submission

You are here

Primary tabs